G.Mahendran, v. Tmt. Supriya Sahu, IAS., and 3 others
CONT P/4095/2025 · 2026-07-09
G Arul Murugan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7959 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7959 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Cont.P.No.4095 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.07.2026
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Cont.P.No.4095 of 2025 G.Mahendran, S/o. Late. Govindasamy, Nappirampatty Village, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. .. Petitioner Vs.
1. Supriya Sahu, IAS., The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Environment, Climate Change and Forest Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
2. Srinivas R. Reddy, I.F.S., The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Head of Forest Force, Vellacherry-Guindy main Raod, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.
3. C.Dinesh Kumar, The District Forest Officer, Krishnagiri Social Forestry and Extension Division, (Formerly Interfaced Forest Division - IFF), Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District. __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.4095 of 2025
4. Kashyap Shashank Ravi, I.F.S., The District Forest Officer, Salem Forest Division, Salem - 636 007. Salem District. .. Contemnors Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish Respondents for disobedience of the
order dated 29.01.2021 made in W.A.No. 1552 of 2019. For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Jothimanian For Contemnors : Mr.R.Veeramani Government Pleader
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) In compliance of the order dated 29.01.2021 passed in W.A.No.1552 of 2019, wherein, direction was given to respondents to consider the claim of petitioner with regard to compassionate appointment, respondents have considered and passed an order rejecting the claim of petitioner. __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.4095 of 2025
2. In view of the fact that the order has been complied with, the contempt petition is closed. Petitioner would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
(SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
09.07.2026
kpl
__________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.4095 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (kpl) Cont.P.No.4095 of 2025
09.07.2026 __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis