Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79586 (PNJ)

DEEPINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CWP/8728/2018 · 2025-04-09

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 102 Deepinder Singh Marahat State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The order dated 20.03.2025 original number and taken on Board today itself CWP-8728- 1. make a representation had also passed away and claim is still pending she being employed, which may be directed to be decided in a tim manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. 2. representation within a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be considered IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-4881 CWP Date of decision Deepinder Singh Marahat Versus State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Brijesh Nandan, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Having heard the learned counsel for t reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The order 20.03.2025 is recalled. The main case is ordered to be restored to its original number and taken on Board today itself -2018 Learned counsel submits that the petitioner be permitted to make a representation in view of the fact that the mother of the petitioner had also passed away and claim is still pending employed, which may be directed to be decided in a tim manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. Disposed of accordingly. In case, the petitioner representation within a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be considered IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 4881-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-8728-2018 (O & M) Date of decision: 09.04.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Brijesh Nandan, Advocate, Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The order is recalled. The main case is ordered to be restored to its original number and taken on Board today itself. submits that the petitioner be permitted to fact that the mother of the petitioner had also passed away and claim is still pending with the observation of employed, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. Disposed of accordingly. In case, the petitioners submit the representation within a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be considered PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.09 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-8728-2018 -2- and decided within a further period of 4 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 09.04.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.09 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.