VINOD KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS
WRIC/1767/2025 · 2025-02-16
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7958 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7958 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:22063 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1767 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohit Verma,Sachida Nand Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Ashok Kumar Rai,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"A. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 17.12.24 passed by respondent no.2 in in RST No. 7139/2024 in Computer Case no. T202414360507139 (Kariya Vs -Gaon Satha) under section 41 U.P.L.R Act
1901. B. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to maintain status quo on spot as on today till the disposal of the writ petition."
3. Learned Standing Counsel as well as learned counsel appearing for respondents have raised a preliminary objection that restoration application filed by the petitioner for recalling the order passed under Section 41 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 has been rejected by the authorities below and the petitioners have remedy of filing appeal or revision against the order impugned.
4. Since the petitioners have an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition.
5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail the remedy as available to them under law. Order Date :- 17.2.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad