CWP-19951 of 2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 121 CWP-19951 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:17.07.2025 Jaswinder Kumar ....Petitioner Versus The Punjab State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Limited and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA **** Present: Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA , J. (Oral) 1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner is praying for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to hear and decide the statutory departmental revision dated 05.06.2025 (Annexure P-4) alongwith application for stay dated 05.06.2025 (Annexure P-5) filed by the petitioner against the order dated 14.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) passed by respondent No.3 being the Appellate Authority and order dated 21.02.2024 (Annexure P-2) passed by respondent No.4 being Punishing Authority, in a time bound manner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, prays that at this stage, he will be satisfied if a direction is given to respondent No.2 to decide the revision petition filed by the petitioner dated DINESH 2025.07.21 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-19951 of 2025 (O&M) 2 05.06.2025 alongwith application for stay dated 05.06.2025 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. He further prays that till the final disposal of the said revision petition, no recovery from the salary of the petitioner be made. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Vikas Arora, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 5. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Revisional Authority to consider and decide the revision petition dated 05.06.2025 (Annexure P-4) alongwith application for stay dated 05.06.2025 (Annexure P-5) filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. Since the statutory revision petition filed by the petitioner is pending and yet to be decided, it will be in the interest of justice that no recovery from the salary of the petitioner be effected. (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE July 17, 2025 dinesh Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH 2025.07.21 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document