2025:KER:26538 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 6TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 26532 OF 2016 PETITIONER: SOVIET P.T. AGED 42 YEARS S/O. THOMASD, AGED 42 YEARS,PAYYAPPILLY HOUSE, KANJIPPADAM P.O.,PUDUKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT(NOW WORKING AS SUB ENGINEER,KSEB ELECTRICAL DIVISION, CHALAKKUDY) BY ADVS. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS SMT.MISHAL M.DASAN RESPONDENTS: 1 THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695004,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2 CHIEF ENGINEER HRM KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695004. 3 DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER KSEB, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE,OPP. BUS STAND, IRINJALAKUDA P.O,THRISSUR- 680121. 4 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KSEB, ELECTRICAL DIVISION,NEAR MUNICIPALITY BUILDING,CHALAKUDY P.O., THRISSUR - 680 307. 5 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KSEB, ELECTRICAL DIVISION,NEAR MUNICIPALITY BUILDING,CHALAKUDY P.O., THRISSUR - 680307. W.P.(C) No.26532 of 2016 2 2025:KER:26538 6 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KSEB, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KODAKARA P.O.,THRISSUR- 680684. 7 ABIMANNUE K.K. S/O. KRISHNANKUTTY, KALLINGAPRAM HO,KALLOOR P.O., THRISSUR - 680 317(NOW WORKING AS SUB ENGINEER, KSEBELECTRICAL SECTION, KODAKARA) 8 JOSE M.V. S/O. VARGHESE, MOONJERLY HOUSE,F2, TRICHUR HOMES, THRISSUR-680006. BY ADVS. SRI.G.KRISHNAKUMAR SMT.M.L.REMYA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No.26532 of 2016 3 2025:KER:26538 P.M. MANOJ, J ------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.26532 of 2016 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of March, 2025 JUDGMENT The writ petition has been filed, being aggrieved by the alleged mala fide and illegal transfer and posting orders. At that point of time, the petitioner was working as a Sub Engineer of the Kerala State Electricity Board, Chalakkudy, and was aggrieved by Exts.P5 and P9 orders of the 3rd respondent. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, nothing survives in the prayers sought for in the writ petition and can be dismissed as infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- P.M.MANOJ JUDGE sss