Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79569 (PNJ)

NANDITA CHATURVEDI v. KUNAL SHARMA

INCOMP/9/2025 · 2025-02-13

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 136 Nandita C Kunal Sha CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU Ajay Singh the Registr Haryana H objections the counsel However, objections. orders. Fol the causeli 25.9.2024: INCOMP No.9-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR INCOMP No.9 DIARY No.102 Date of decision dita Chaturvedi Versus al Sharma AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The aforesaid petition was fi Singh, Advocate. However, certain egistry on 21.8.2024. As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Part ana High Court Rules and Orders, ctions have been raised by the Regist ounsel party, who filed it, to re-file w ever, the same was not taken back fo ctions. On failure, the case is to be li rs. Following note was displayed/pub auselist and website of this Hon'ble .2024:- "All the Advocates/P collect the cases as men 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 9 of 2025 277947 cision :-13.02.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA was filed on 20.8.2024 by Mr. rtain objections were raised by I, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and rders, the petition, on which Registry is to be taken back by file within a period of 40 days. ack for refiling after removal of o be listed before the Court for ed/published by the Registry in on'ble Court on 18.9.2024 and es/Parties are requested to mentioned in the list attached VIJAY ASIJA 2025.02.15 18.02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Advocate objections, been listed further ord records. February Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo INCOMP No.9-2025 below which are lying Counter of DRR Branc today, within one month of this notice, failing w the Caveat Application Hon'ble Court on judi orders." Even after the publication of cate to collect his case for re-fili ctions, the needful was not done. Con listed before this Court in urgent list to There is no representation on b Keeping in view the aforesai r order is required to be passed. The 13, 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 ying pending in the Objection ranch and not taken back till onth of the date of publication ng which all the cases (except ations) will be listed before judicial side for appropriate tion of the note requesting the filing after rectification of e. Consequently, the matter has t list today. n on behalf of the petitioner. foresaid facts of the matter, no d. The file be consigned to the ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.02.15 18.02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document