- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46394 WP No. 14666 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 14666 OF 2018 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI. NAGESH S/O OBALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT ATTIBELE VILLAGE ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562 107 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. G A VISWANATHA REDDY, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT BANGALORE - 560 009 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH SUB DIVISION BANGALORE-560 009 3. THE TAHASILDAR ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL - 56007 BANGALORE DISTRICT 4. MASJID-E-NIMRAH REPT. BY LATHIFF SAB ATTIBELE VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46394 WP No. 14666 of 2018 ANEKAL TALUK - 5621 07 BANGALORE DISTRICT 5. SMT RAJAMMA SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS 5(A) SMT RATHNAMMA W/O KENCHAPPA @ KRISHNAPPA D/O LATE MUNIYAPPA SINCE DEAD HAVE NO LRS 5(B) SMT JAYAMMA W/O SRINIVAS REDDY D/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK - 562 107 BANGALORE DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NEELAKANTAPPA K PUJAR, HCGP FOR R1-3, SRI. K. SRINIVASA, ADVOCATE FOR R4, SRI. D.J. GOVINDARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED R8, R5(B) - SERVED, ABSENT) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 10.05.2017 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT BANGALORE IN R.P.NO.64/2011-12 VIDE ANNX-A BY CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE SOUTH SUB DIVISION BANGALORE IN RA.NO.330/2006-07 DTD 12.04.2011 VIDE ANNX-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46394 WP No. 14666 of 2018 ORAL ORDER This Court vide order dated 14.06.2021 directed the learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish requisites for issuance of notice to respondent Nos.4 and 5(a) on or before 30.06.2021 or else the petition will be listed for necessary orders on 13.07.2021. 2. However, though the matter is listed for rectification of office objections raised on I.A.No.1/2024, there is no representation for the petitioner or his counsel even on the second call. Hence, it seems that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this writ petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE CR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7