Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7955 (KER)

M/S.HIMAVARSHA KURIES PRIVATE LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) v. THRESIAMMA JOSE

CC/679/2020 · 2025-01-08

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM (Original Jurisdiction) Present: The Honourable Mr.Justice HARISANKAR V.MENON Wednesday, the 8th day of January, 2025/18th Pousha, 1946 In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956 and In the matter of M/s.Himavarsha Kuries Pvt. Ltd. (In Liquidation) C.C.No.679/2020 in C.P.No.13/2014 CLAIMANT M/s.Himavarsha Kuries Pvt. Ltd. (In Liquidation), Represented by the Official Liquidator, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam. RESPONDENT Thresiamma Jose, Muttichookkaran House, Chavarampadam, Mulayam – 680 751. This Claim coming on for hearing on this day in the presence of Smt.S.Jasmine, Standing Counsel for the Official Liquidator and the Respondent being absent and set ex-parte, this Court delivered the following:- 2 C.C.No.679 of 2020 HARISANKAR V. MENON, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Company Claim No.679 of 2020 in Co. Pet. No.13 of 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of January, 2025 JUDGMENT The Official Liquidator has filed claim affidavit dated 22.10.2020, seeking a decree against the respondent for a sum of Rs.16,000/- along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the principal debt amount from 02.07.2009 till date of decree; and thereafter at the rate of 12% on the said sum, till the date of realisation. 2. There is no appearance for the respondent in spite of valid service of notice, nor is there any opposition to the claim. The respondent is hence declared ex parte. 3. Since there is no serious dispute regarding the principal amount claimed, this application is allowed and an amount of Rs.16,000/- is decreed against the respondent, to be paid along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the said sum from 02.07.2009 till realisation. No costs. Sd/- HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE anm