Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79543 (PNJ)

RAJ BAKSH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/19960/2025 · 2025-08-07

Harsh Bunger

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-19960-2025 (O&M) -1- 147 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-19960-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.08.2025 Raj Baksh ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present: Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. ***** HARSH BUNGER J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus for directing the official respondents to carry out demarcation of the land, which comes under Arainwala to Lakhewali road in District Fazilka. 2. Mr. Karminder Singh, Advocate appears and files his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.5 in Court today, which is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. 3. At the outset, learned State counsel, on instructions from Mr. Prabhjeet Singh, Block Development and Panchayat Officer, submits that the prayer for demarcation, submitted by the petitioner, would be considered by the concerned authorities within a period of four weeks from today. HIMANI GUPTA 2025.08.11 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-19960-2025 (O&M) -2- 4. Keeping in view the aforesaid stand taken by learned State counsel, the present petition is disposed of accordingly. 5. All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. 07.08.2025 (HARSH BUNGER) Himani JUDGE 1. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable : Yes/No HIMANI GUPTA 2025.08.11 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document