IN THE HIGH 132 Bodh Raj State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. as part-time Sweeper w.e.f. Dhar-II, District Gurdaspur, entitled to regularization in terms of the Inst also of 18.02.2011 and 17.11.2011, 09.04.2025, Annexure P same has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction m bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. 2. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the period of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Randhir Singh Manhas, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been working time Sweeper w.e.f. 01.09.1998 in the Govt. Middle School, Kot, II, District Gurdaspur, and continued for the last 35 years, and thus, entitled to regularization in terms of the Inst also of 18.02.2011 and 17.11.2011, regarding which 09.04.2025, Annexure P-4, has been served upon the respondents yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 09.04.2025, 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19867-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 17.07.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been working 01.09.1998 in the Govt. Middle School, Kot, and continued for the last 35 years, and thus, entitled to regularization in terms of the Instructions dated 04.03.1999 as regarding which a legal notice dated has been served upon the respondents, but the yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a ay be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to legal notice dated 09.04.2025, within a months, which this Court has no reason to believe the PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.17 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-19867-2025 -2- authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 17.07.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.17 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.