1 2025:CGHC:7097 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1050 of 2025 1 - Ramsharan Singaur S/o Awadhram Singaur Aged About 62 Years R/o Village- Bhadam, Post-Bhadam, Distt - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Technical Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Technical Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension, Bilaspur, Distt-Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Principal Government Engineering College, Bilaspur, Distt- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Advocate For State/Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajit Singh, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07/02/2025 1. Heard Mr. Syed Majid Ali, learned counsel petitioners as well as Mr. Ajit Singh, learned Government Advocate for State / respondents. 2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs: “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No. 2 & 3 to release the amount of leave encashment in the favour of the petitioner.” Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was initially appointed as a Daily Wager with the respondent department and subsequently services of the petitioner was regularized. Petitioner after permanent status had retired after attaining the age of superannuation. During his service, the petitioner has performed his duties and obligations bestowed upon him with utmost sincerity and to the best of his capabilities with an unblemished service record. He submits that in the light of judgment passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No.3870 of 2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.) and other connected matters decided on 30.09.2022, the petitioner is also entitled for leave encashment. 4. Learned State counsel submits that sufficient documents have not been filed by the petitioner and it is also not reflected as to whether the petitioner has completed the minimum period of service to avail the benefit of leave encashment. 5. I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the documents available in record. 6. Be that as it may, without commenting anything on the merits, this petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make detailed representation before the concerned respondent / competent authority within the period of ‘30 days’ from the date of receipt of copy of this order with all necessary documents to substantiate his claim. In the event of filing of representation, on due verification, if the petitioner is found to be similarly situated 3 person, as in the case of Faguvaram Patel (surpa), his claim shall be decided by the respondents in light of judgment of Faguvaram Patel (Supra) expeditiously preferably within the period of ‘90 days’ from the date of submission of the said representation. 7. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shayna