Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:8246 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS/842/2023 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Narain Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State / respondent nos. 1 to 4.
3. Mr. Anil K. Bisht, Advocate for respondent no. 5.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous due to subsequent developments.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
16.09.2025
Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487d f006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA8 75643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.09.17 10:18:27 +05'30'