Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79497 (KAR)

VEERANAN ARADHYA v. RENUKA

CRP/479/2019 · 2025-12-10

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52178 CRP No. 479 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 479 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. SRI VEERANAN ARADHYA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 2. SRI.NIJAGUNA ARADHYA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 3. SRI.JAYASHEKAR ARADHYA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS ALL ARE CHILDRENS OF LATE DODDAMALLARADHYA ALL ARE R/AT CHILAKAVADI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VINAY RAGHAVENDRA, ADVOCATE COURT NOTICE IS ISSUED TO P1 TO P3 ARE SERVED) AND: 1. SMT RENUKA W/O SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2. SRI.V.SHIVANANJAPPA S/O LATE VEERATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 3. SMT.PADMA W/O LATE NAGARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52178 CRP No. 479 of 2019 4. SRI.MAHESH S/O LATE MAHADEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 5. SRI PRABHUSWAMY S/O LATE VEERATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT CHILAKAVADI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK-571440. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. P C SUNITHA., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R5) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED: 09.09.2019 PASSED ON IA.NO. 6 BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLLEGAL IN OS.NO.152/2019 AND ALLOW THIS REVISION PETITION WITH COSTS AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER On account of death of Sri T.N.Raghupathi, this Court, by way of abundant caution issued court notice. Court notice served. Petitioners have not chosen to engage any other advocate. 2. Sri Vinay Raghavendra, learned counsel, submits that, it was the brief of his Senior Office, who is no more. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52178 CRP No. 479 of 2019 3. Placing his submission on record and taking note of the fact that the petitioners have not chosen to engage any other advocate, petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE CM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34