IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (117-3) CWP-20072-2025 Date of decision:- 02.09.2025 M/S Satish Aggarwal & Co. ...Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Vikrampreet Arora, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4 – Municipal Corporation, Jalandhar. … SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1. In deference to the previous order passed by this Court, counsel for respondents No.3 and 4 has placed on record a copy of speaking order No.1456/CE/Cantt/D, dated 29.08.2025, which is taken on record. A copy thereof has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner. It has been submitted that the amount of Rs.5,34,520/- has been released to the petitioner. 2. In all fairness, counsel for the petitioner states that the petition has become infructuous as the amount has been released to the petitioner. 3. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 02.09.2025 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.09.03 15:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment