- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44708 WP No. 31967 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 31967 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: VAIJAYANTHI W/O VARADARAJU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO.158, SC BEEDI, HONDARABALU, MADHUVANAHALLI POST, KOLLEGAL, CHAMARAJANAGARA DIST-571440. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT, CHAMARAJANAGARA-571313. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KOLLEGALA SUB-DIVISION, KOLLEGALA, CHAMARAJANAGARA DIST- 571313. Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44708 WP No. 31967 of 2025 4. THE TAHASILDAR, KOLLEGALA TALUK, KOLLEGALA, CHAMARAJANAGARA DIST- 571313. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-4 THAT IS, TAHSILDAR, KOLLEGALA TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT AND TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER DATED 03.10.2025 AS PER ANNEXURE-E AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS THEREON IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER The petitioner has sought for issuance of writ of mandamus to respondent No.4 - Tahsildar to consider the representation at Annexure-E. In terms of Annexure-E, the petitioner submits that they are in possession and during the process of digitizing the revenue records, petitioner's name has been left out. Accordingly, the petitioner had sought effecting of relevant entries. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44708 WP No. 31967 of 2025 2. The respondent authorities have issued an endorsement rejecting the request of the petitioner on various grounds. 3. Without entering into the validity of the endorsement, it would be appropriate to dispose of the petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the endorsement before the Appellate authority as per law. All contentions of the petitioner are kept open. Needless to state, in the event of any appeal filed, same to be considered expeditiously. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE MCR