Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79452 (KAR)

MRS. LAKSHMI MOGERTHI v. MRS. SUMATHI D. SHETTY

RSA/1741/2024 · 2025-12-04

H P Sandesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50782 RSA No. 1741 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1741 OF 2024 (POS) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. LAKSHMI MOGERTHI AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS W/O CHIKKA MOGERA 2. MR. SANJEEVA @ MANI AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O LAKSHMI MOGERTHI RESIDING AT DOOR NO. 2/28 3. MRS. BHARATHI AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS W/O SANJEEVA @ MANI ALL ARE R/AT DOOR NO.2/28 KALAVARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH SALVADI, NEAR NAKKERI 5 CENTS COLONY KALAVARA VILLAGE P O SALVADI - 576 222 KUNDAPURA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50782 RSA No. 1741 of 2024 AND: 1. MRS. SUMATHI D. SHETTY AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS D/O LATE VANAJAKSHI SHEDTHI 2. MR. ARUN KUMAR SHETTY AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS S/O LATE VANAJAKSHI SHEDTHI 3. MR. SAJAN HEGDE AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS S/O LATE SMT. SUPREETHA HEGDE 4. MR. SUYOGH HEGDE AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS S/O SMT. SUPREETHA HEDGE 1 TO 4 RESIDENTS OF SUMRUDDHI, SALVADI KALAVAR VILLAGE P O SALVADI - 576 222 KUNDAPURA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT 5. MR. SUBBA MOGERA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LAKSHMI MOGERTHI R/O 2/28, SALVADI KALAVAR GRAM PANCHAYATH P O SALVADI - 576 222 KUNDAPURA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRASANNA V R, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4; R/O DT. 30.10.2025, NOTICE TO R4 D/W) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50782 RSA No. 1741 of 2024 THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.10.2024 PASSED IN R.A. NO.22/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KUNDAPURA AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants files a memo along with the affidavit of the appellants seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the parties have settled the matter out of the Court. The said memo and the affidavit are taken on record. In view of the said memo, the counsel for the appellants is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN