1 2025:CGHC:7412-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 528 of 2025 1 - Manne Chinmayi W/o Dr. Y. Rajshekhar And D/o Manne Jaiprakash Aged About 40 Years R/o New Kalyani Apartment, Flat No. 10/179, R.T.C. Colony, Four Line, Police Station Patamata, District Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh. 2 - Manne Jaiprakash S/o Late Shiv Rao Aged About 67 Years R/o New Kalyani Apartment, Flat No. 10/179, R.T.C. Colony, Four Line, Police Station Patamata, District Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Lines Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Dr. Y. Rajshekhar S/o Y. R. Krishna Aged About 44 Years R/o Jaipal Towers Flats No. 403- Sanket Apartments, Behind Hotel East Park, Agrasen Chowk, Police Station Civil Lines Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Amarnath Pandey, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 12.02.2025 1. Heard Mr. Amarnath Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent No.1. ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.02.13 10:13:38 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:- “(1) quash FIR dated 22.01.2019 in Crime No.54/2019 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.), u/s 294, 384, 389, 506/34 of Indian Penal Code in relation to the present petitioners. (2) Pass any other order in view of the special facts and circumstances mentioned in the present petition, in the interest of justice.” 3. Mr. Hariom Rai, leaned Panel Lawyer submits that in the present case, investigation has been concluded and charge-sheet has been submitted in the Court concerned on 31.12.2024. 4. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to take recourse to law, if aggrieved by the charge-sheet, if the matter survives. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu