DR. SURENDRANATH SINGH @ DR. S. N. SINGH v. SMT. KIRAN KUMARI
CRL.P/4519/2022 · 2025-07-30
J M Khazi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79447 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79447 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29392 CRL.P No. 4519 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4519 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
DR. SURENDRANATH SINGH @ DR. S. N. SINGH S/O N K SINGH AGED 69 YEARS RESIDENT OF NO 561, 12TH CROSS J P NAGAR 2ND PHASE, BANGALORE ALSO AT C/O SAINT MORGAN PHARMACEUTICAL NO 14, 4TH CROSS, JCI LAYOUT KANAKAPURA ROAD, BANGALORE-560062
2.
SAINT MORGAN PHARMACEUTICAL REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR DR S N SINGH NO 14, 4TH CROSS, JCI LAYOUT KANAKAPURA ROAD BANGALORE-560062 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. N V VASANTH, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND:
SMT. KIRAN KUMARI W/O J RAMESH AGED 56 YEARS R/AT NO 31/1, SANIDHI ROAD N R CORNER, SRINIVASA COOL CORNER
Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29392 CRL.P No. 4519 of 2022
BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE …RESPONDENT (NIL)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 07.01.2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED LXIII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE (CCH-64) AT BENGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.34/2022 THEREBY DIRECTING THE PETITIONER TO DEPOSIT THE 20 PERCENT OF THE FINE AMOUNT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
ORAL ORDER
No representation for petitioners.
2. No representation for petitioners even in the afternoon session.
3. This matter is of the year 2022.
4. Vide order dated 21.07.2025, as a last chance, a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29392 CRL.P No. 4519 of 2022
5. Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition.
6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default.
Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE
RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5