IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1930 of 2025 ------ Mamta Kumari, aged about 41 years, Son of- Sanjay Kumar Ram, Resident of- Kaithahar Kala, P.O.+P.S.- Sujayatpur, Dist.- Buxar (Bihar) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 25-03-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending her arrest in connection with Barwadih P.S. Case No.08 of 2022 instituted under Sections 406, 420, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the main owner of Amrita Foundation Society and formed a group of women to provide training for employment for which Rs.200/- was taken from each woman and Amrita Foundation Society has collected Rs.2,22,800/- for imparting training but after lapse of time no employment has been provided to anyone. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that there is no allegation against the petitioner of taking any money from anyone. It is further submitted that there is no document to show that the petitioner is the owner of the said Amrita Foundation Society. It is then submitted that in fact, the petitioner is in no way concerned with the said Amrita Foundation Society rather she is a Government Teacher in Bihar. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been given the privileges of anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.07.2023 passed in A.B.A. No.11272 of 2022. It is also submitted that the petitioner is a female. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and she will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of her arrest or surrendering, she will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.25,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Latehar in connection with Barwadih P.S. Case No.08 of 2022 with the condition that she will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish her mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that she will not change her mobile number during the pendency of the case and she will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/