Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79416 (ALL)

SIYARAM TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/10532/2025 · 2025-07-28

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:125649 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10532 of 2025 Petitioner :- Siyaram Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinayak Mithal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main prayer:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus commanding the respondent No.2 to re-consider the claim of the petitioner for his regularization under section 33-C which is pending before him." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner made a representation before respondent no.1 on 20.04.2025. The same has been forwarded to respondent no.2, Joint Director of Education, Vindhyachal Mandal, Mirzapur on 23.05.2025 and the same is pending before him. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that petitioner's Application under Section 33-C of U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982, which is pending before respondent no.2, may be directed to be decided in accordance with law, in time bound manner. 4. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 5. Heard Mr. Vinayak Mithal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Ms. Manjula Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 6. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Respondent no.2, Joint Director of Education, Vindhyachal Mandal, Mirzapur is directed to decide the aforesaid Application under Section 33-C of the Act, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 7. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 29.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad