SAURABH ARORA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/40053/2025 · 2025-09-12
Sukhvinder Kaur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79404 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79404 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 244 CRM-M-40053-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.09.2025. Saurabh Arora and others ....Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Ms. Jasleen Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Omkar Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sulinder Kumar, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Mamta, Advocate for Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR
, J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.46 dated 31.03.2022 under Sections 323, 427, 147, 149, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station DLF-II, Gurgaon, and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 10.07.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2 . This Court vide order dated 28.07.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurugram and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned KOMAL 2025.09.15 10:08 I attest to the accuracy of this document
CRM-M-40053-2025 (O&M) -2- Magistrate has submitted report dated 21.08.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.46 dated 31.03.2022 under Sections 323, 427, 147, 149, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station DLF-II, Gurgaon, and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 10.07.2025 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioners. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 12.09.2025 Komal
Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable?
: Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.09.15 10:08 I attest to the accuracy of this document