HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14314 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Pankaj Pandey, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Jagdish Pathak as well as Sri Diptiman Singh, Advocates for respondents. 2. It is informed that the matter is still sub judice before Appellate Authority under Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Act, 1954 before Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Mumbai, therefore, claim of petitioners for provident fund cannot be adjudicated by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner has not able to dispute the same. 4. Dismissed accordingly. October 13, 2025 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Diptiman Singh, Jagdish Pathak (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Ashok Kumar Maurya And 16 Others .....Petitioner(s) Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad