Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79398 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

NA529/2512/2025 · 2025-07-30

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:128061 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2512 of 2025 Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Jaiswal,Dileep Kumar Yadava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No. 6302 of 2024, arising out of case crime no. 1422 of 2023, under Sections 420, 406 IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Jaunpur pending in the Court of C.J.M., Jaunpur expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the informant in the said case and same is pending since 2024. It is also submitted that the opposite party nos.2 to 4 are not cooperating with the Court concerned and are adopting delaying tactics in disposal of the said case and only dates are being fixed in the matter. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said case. The opposite party nos.2 to 4 are continuously absconding and have not appeared so far in the matter. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. It reveals from the perusal of the order sheets that the case is pending at the stage of evidence but the accused persons are not cooperating with the trial court. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to invoke the powers given to it under law to ensure the presence of the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 by sending appropriate process within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it and thereafter all endeavours shall be made by it for expeditious disposal of the case, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 31.7.2025 safi Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad