Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79345 (PNJ)

GURMEET KAUR v. SANDEEP KUMAR MALIK, IPS, SSP, HOSHIARPUR

COCP/3395/2025 · 2025-07-17

Suvir Sehgal

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-3395-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (106) COCP-3395-2025 Date of decision:- 17.07.2025 Gurmeet Kaur ...Petitioner Versus Sh. Sandeep Kumar Malik ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Aditya Sharda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Kanav Singla, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. … SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1. Instant contempt petition has been filed under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging defiance of direction dated 16.05.2025, Annexure P-1, passed by this Court. 2. Advance copy of the petition has been served upon the respondent. 3. State counsel has placed on record a xerox copy of communication bearing No.49122, dated 14.06.2025, to submit that pursuant to direction, Annexure P-1, representation submitted by the petitioner has been examined and a speaking order has been passed. Copy thereof has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of above, as direction, Annexure P-1, has been complied with, no contempt is made out. PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.07.17 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment COCP-3395-2025 -2- 5. Petition is dismissed. 6. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to assail the order, if so advised, in accordance with law. (SUVIR SEHGAL) 17.07.2025 JUDGE Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.07.17 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment