GURMEET KAUR v. SANDEEP KUMAR MALIK, IPS, SSP, HOSHIARPUR
COCP/3395/2025 · 2025-07-17
Suvir Sehgal
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79345 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79345 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP-3395-2025
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (106)
COCP-3395-2025 Date of decision:- 17.07.2025 Gurmeet Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus Sh. Sandeep Kumar Malik
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Aditya Sharda, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Kanav Singla, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. …
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)
1. Instant contempt petition has been filed under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging defiance of direction dated 16.05.2025, Annexure P-1, passed by this Court.
2. Advance copy of the petition has been served upon the respondent.
3. State counsel has placed on record a xerox copy of communication bearing No.49122, dated 14.06.2025, to submit that pursuant to direction, Annexure P-1, representation submitted by the petitioner has been examined and a speaking order has been passed. Copy thereof has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner.
4. In view of above, as direction, Annexure P-1, has been complied with, no contempt is made out.
PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.07.17 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
COCP-3395-2025
-2-
5. Petition is dismissed.
6. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to assail the order, if so advised, in accordance with law.
(SUVIR SEHGAL) 17.07.2025
JUDGE Pardeep
Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.07.17 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment