- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47793 MSA No. 171 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 171 OF 2024 (LA) BETWEEN: SOMEGOWDA S/O NANJEGOWDA DEAD BY LRS 1. CHANDRAMMA W/O LATE SOMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, 2. MALLIGAMMA W/O DEVARAJU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 3. SHIVEGOWDA S/O LATE SOMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 4. NANJEGOWDA S/O LATE SOMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 5. SATISHA S/O LATE SOMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. APPELLANT 1, 3 AND 5 ARE R/AT GUNDASHETTYHALLI VILLAGE, SALAGAME HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK - 573 201 2ND APPELLANT IS R/AT NINGAPPANAKOPPALU VILLAGE, HALEBEEDU HOBLI, BELUR TALUK - 573 201. …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. SHARADAMBA A.R., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47793 MSA No. 171 of 2024 AND: THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, HRP 2, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, 1ST FLOOR HASSAN - 573 201 …RESPONDENT THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 06.03.2019 PASSED IN LAC (APPEAL) NO.95/2017 ON THE FILE OF 5TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN., PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 05.08.2005 PASSED IN LAC.139/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE FILED UNDER SECTION 18(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT. THIS MSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants is absent. No representation even when the matter is passed over twice and again called out. 2. Cost of Rs.500/- was not paid and there are five office objections, which are not yet complied with. 3. The order sheet dated 25.09.2025 reads as under: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47793 MSA No. 171 of 2024 "Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks short accommodation to cure the office objections including payment of Court fee. Finally, two weeks' time is granted to cure the office objections on payment of cost of Rs.500/- to the Karnataka State High Court Legal Services Committee." 4. Inspite of that, there is no representation. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BH CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12