- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29281 WP No. 13111 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 13111 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. H.E.CHANDRAPPA S/O H.ESHWARPPA, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 566/5, II CROSS, ADARSH NILAYA, NITUVALLI, DAVANAGERE DAVANAGERE-577 004. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDANOORU VISHWANATHA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. B.R.ANITHA W/O M.G.SOMASHEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.1948/13, VIDYANAGAR MAIN ROAD, TARALABALU BADAVANE, DAVANAGERE-577 005. 2. SRI. B.R.SWAMYNATHAN S/O. LATE B.M.RAJASHEKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O SOMASHETTIHALLI VILLAGE, LINGADAHALLI POST, CHANNGIRI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 221. 3. KUM.INDRAMMA D/O LATE B.M.RAJASHEKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O SOMASHETTIHALLI VILLAGE, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29281 WP No. 13111 of 2025 LINGADAHALLI, CHANNGIRI TQ, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 221. 4. SMT.B.R.SAVITHA W/O M.JAGADISH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 1/9, 8TH CROSS, THANGANNA NILAYA, VIDYA NAGAR, DAVANAGERE-577 005. 5. SRI.B.R.NATARAJ, S/O LATE B.M.RAJASHEKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, EXECUTIVE IN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE, R/O 71/4, I FLOOR, 'ABHIMANA NILAYA', 10TH CROSS, JARAGANAHALLI, J.P.NAGAR, 6TH PHASE, BENGALURU-560 078. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BALAPPA HIREKURABAR., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRADEEPA.S.B., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29281 WP No. 13111 of 2025 Sri.Balappa Hirekurabar., counsel on behalf of Sri.Pradeepa.S.B., for caveator/ respondent No.1 has appeared in person. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28