Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7932 (GAU)

SATYAM SEWA SOMMITTEE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 4 ORS.

WP(C)/5029/2017 · 2025-03-09

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010035662017 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5029/2017 SATYAM SEWA SOMMITTEE REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI RAJU SINGHA, S/O LATE TAPAN SINGHA, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT WARD NO.06, N.T. ROAD, PS-NORTH LAKHIMPUR, DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 4 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPTT., SACHIVALAYA, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST. LAKHIMPUR 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER NORTH COMMISSIONER NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST- LAKHIMPUR 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST. LAKHIMPUR 5:THE NORTH LAKHIMPUR MUNICIPAL BOARD REP. BY HEREIN BY ITS CHAIRMAN NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST. LAKHIMPU Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.N SARKAR, MR.B D GOSWAMI Advocate for the Respondent : MR.J HANDIQUE R-5, MS G HAZARIKA,SC, REVENUE,GA, ASSAM Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 10.03 .2025 Mr. N. Sarkar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that in view of the subsequent development, the writ petition has become infructuous and prays that the writ petition may be closed with liberty to file afresh. Mr. J. Handique, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5 is present. In view of the above, the writ petition stands closed with liberty to file afresh. JUDGE Comparing Assistant