- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34759 WP No. 26651 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 26651 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SMT. ZENAB BAI BOHRA W/O. ABBAS ALI BOHRA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT NO.1109/3-2, 47TH CROSS, JAYANAGARA 5TH BLOCK, VTC BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU - 560 041. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANGADI SOMASHEKAR CHANNABASAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDANASOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, KANAKAPURA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 062. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA A. TO ISSUE A WRIT OF Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34759 WP No. 26651 of 2025 MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER A REPRESENTATION DATED 16-07-2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-J. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for both the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been conferred occupancy rights at the hands of the Land Tribunal, Bangalore South Taluk on 30.08.1980 in case bearing No.LRF.170/1975-76 and it is also contended that Form No.10 was issued in favour of the petitioner at the hands of the Tahsildar. However, the name of the petitioner was not entered in the revenue records. The petitioner is seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent-Tahsildar, to consider the representation dated 16.07.2025 at Annexure-J and enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34759 WP No. 26651 of 2025 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent-Tahsildar, Bangalore South Taluk, to verify from the records and find out if grant was made in favour of the petitioner, If it is found from the records that the facts stated hereinabove are true, then the Tahsildar shall proceed to enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of two weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17 CT: BHK