Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79287 (ALL)

SANJEEV RANJAN PANDEY v. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/10825/2025 · 2025-07-30

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:128211 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10825 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanjeev Ranjan Pandey Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Paritosh Sukla,Prashant Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Suman Jaiswal Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution petitioner seeks relief against Railways. 2. Ms. Suman Jaiswal, learned counsel for respondent submits that since Railways are notified under Section 14 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 petitioner should approach the Central Administrative Tribunal in the first instance. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner could not dispute the same. 4. In view of the above, I decline to grant indulgence in the matter at this stage. 5. The petition is consigned to records. However, liberty rests with the petitioner to approach the Tribunal, if so advised. Order Date :- 31.7.2025 Nadeem Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad