Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:125319-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24517 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nigam Kumar Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vineet Pandey Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
1. Heard Shri Rajesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri Vineet Pandey, learned counsel for the U.P. Avas Evam Vikash Parishad.
2. The instant writ petition is preferred for quashing the cancellation order (which has never been supplied to the petitioner) passed by the respondent authorities for re-auction of the house/plot No.2-B/81, which was allotted to the petitioner vide allotment letter dated 20.01.2022, and for direction to the respondent authorities to receive the entire outstanding amount and handover the possession of the allotted house to him.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner belongs to Economically Weaker Section. He applied for and was allotted LIG House No.2-B/81 vide allotment letter dated 20.01.2022 issued by respondent no.5. He submits that certain amount has been deposited by the petitioner in lieu of the allotment, the details of which have also been averred in para 5 of the writ petition. There is every likelihood that the petitioner will be uprooted from his dwelling unit. In case, some breathing time is accorded, the petitioner will also clear the remaining outstanding
amount within a reasonable time. He further submits that the petitioner is inclined to clear the entire outstanding amount and as such, to show his bonafide, he is ready to deposit the demand draft of Rs.25 Lacs to the authority within 25 days.
3. Shri Vineet Pandey submits that he has no objection in case the petitioner is inclined to deposit the outstanding amount.
4. In case, the petitioner deposits the demand draft of Rs. 25 Lacs within 25 days from today, the respondent no.5 may send a notice of quantification of balance amount to the petitioner and the same should also be cleared within a period of three months, failing which, the authority would be at liberty to cancel the allotment as per the law.
5. With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 29.7.2025 A. V. Singh Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad