Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79278 (ALL)

HUSNA BANO AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/24605/2025 · 2025-07-28

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:127228 Court No. - 77 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24605 of 2025 Petitioner :- Husna Bano And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and have solemnized marriage with each other of their own freewill according to Hindu Rites and Custom on 08.06.2025 and they have also applied online on 09.06.2025 seeking registration of their marriage, and for that they are being threatened and harassed by respondent no.4 with the collusion of local police. Learned counsel for petitioners further submitted that in pursuance of the hindrances being created by respondent no.4, petitioners shall move representation before the Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj. 4. Considering the threat perception and circumstances as demonstrated, Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj is hereby directed to provide a mobile number to both the petitioners which may be received by an officer not below the rank of Sub-Inspector of concerned police station, so that in case of any urgency or emergency, the same may be dialed by either of the petitioners for apprising any urgency or emergency arises for calling that officer. 5. Specific instructions be issued to officer concerned deputed by Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj to respond the call as and when made by either of the petitioners by way of taking all measures for protecting and safeguarding their liberty from any anti-social elements or other family members of either of the petitioners. 6. The above-mentioned protection shall be operative only for six months from today and thereafter assessing the circumstances and security threat, if available, the decision will be taken by Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj either to extend the same or to stop and the same shall be intimated to the petitioners. 7. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. 8. Registrar (Compliance) is hereby directed to ensure service of this order upon Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj within 72 hours for necessary compliance. Order Date :- 29.7.2025 Rama Kant Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad