- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37143 WP No. 17837 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 17837 OF 2025 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: N. S. GULZAR PASHA S/O SYED ABDUL ALEEM AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS R/A NOORAPURA GANDLAHALLI POST SRINIVASAPURA TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT- 563 135 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BASAVARAJU M.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KSRTC CENTRAL OFFICES K.H. ROAD SHANTHI NAGAR BANGALORE- 560 027 2. THE DIRECTOR (ESTABLISHMENT AND VIGILANCE) THE CHAIRMAN, THE COMMITTEE FOR VERIFICATION OF ALTERNATIVE JOB, KSRTC, CENTRAL OFFICES, SHANTHI NAGAR, BANGALORE- 560 027 3. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER KSRTC, KOLAR DIVISION, Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37143 WP No. 17837 of 2025 KOLAR- 563 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RENUKA H.R., ADVOCATE) *** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED PROCEEDINGS BEARING NO. KARASA. KEKA. SIBBANDI.C-6 / 109 / 346 / 2025-26 DATED 03-05/06/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE S TO THE WRIT PETITION PASSED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT INSOFAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AT SERIAL NO.74., ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondents are present. 2. The prayer sought in this petition is for quashing the impugned proceedings bearing No.Karasa.Keka. Sibbandi.C-6/109/346/2025-26 dated 03.05/06.2025, passed by second respondent, vide Annexure S, insofar as - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37143 WP No. 17837 of 2025 petitioner is concerned at Sl.No.74 and direct the second respondent to extract light work to the petitioner in terms of Section 20(4) of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 with pay protection, considering the opinion given by the Medical Board. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined the regular work in the respondent Corporation, which is affirmed by the learned counsel for respondents. Hence, the petition would not survive for consideration. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as the petitioner has joined the regular work in the respondent Corporation. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE BMV* List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0