HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4011 of 2024 Court No. - 91 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. Case called out in the revised call. None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press the present revision. Shri Dilip Kumar Goswami, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 as well as learned AGA for the State are present. 2. Shri Dilip Kumar Goswami, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has made a statement at bar that the instant revision was filed against the order of interim maintenance and now final order in the proceedings under Sections 125 Cr.P.C. has been passed, therefore, the instant revision has rendered infructuous. 3. Learned AGA does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. Accordingly, the instant revision is dismissed as infructuous. September 19, 2025 Akbar Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Hemant Sharma, Saurabh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Madan Pal Singh,J.) Suhel Parvez .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKBAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad