IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 70 of 2025 Decided on: 07.03.2025 Neeraj Kumar and Anr. .…Petitioners. Versus Dasondhi Lal …Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate. For the respondent : Nemo. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners has sought permission to withdraw the instant petition. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. 2. Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) 7th March, 2025 Judge (sushma) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?