Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79262 (KAR)

SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/12104/2023 · 2025-08-13

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31433 CRL.P No. 12104 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12104 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 11, NEW VENKATESH BUILDING, OLD POLICE STATION ROAD, K R PURAM, BANGALORE-560036 2. SRI THYAGARAJ C S/O SRI CHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT 15, RAMAKKA COMPOUND, 6TH CROSS, PULIKESH STREET, OLD POST OFFICE ROAD, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BANGALORE-560016 3. SMT SADHANA M D/O MUKUNDAIAHA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO 1, 1ST LEFT, PRERANA SCHOOL ROAD, KONADASAPURA, BENGALURU-560049 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LOKESHA J K, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31433 CRL.P No. 12104 of 2023 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY AVALAHALLI POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS GOVERNMENT PLEADER HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU-560009 2. SRI V K RAJU S/O VEERANNA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NO 41, 6TH MAIN, V R LAYOUT, MARTHAHALLI POST, BENGALURU-560037 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.LAKSHMAN, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE PETITIONERS IN FIR NO.360/2023 OF RESPONDENT NO.1/AVALAHALLI POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.427,149,447 OF IPC NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED I ACJM AT BENGALURU RURAL. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioners. 2. No representation for petitioners even in the afternoon session. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31433 CRL.P No. 12104 of 2023 3. This matter is of the year 2023. 4. Vide order dated 01.08.2025, as a last chance, two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. 5. Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. 6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9