Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79261 (KAR)

SMT LATE SUSILA RAMALINGAM v. MR CHETHAN KUMAR T

RFA/1595/2022 · 2025-09-18

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39414-DB RFA No. 1595 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1595 OF 2022 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LATE SUSILA RAMALINGAM W/O LATE D. RAMALINGAM AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS THROUGH HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES ORIGINAL DEFENDANT No.2 AND ORIGINAL DEFENDANT No.3 2. SRI. B.R. ARAVIND KUMAR S/O LATE D. RAMALINGAM AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 3. SRI. B.R. ARJUN S/O LATE D. RAMALINGAM AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT. No.1/3 1ST FLOOR, 5TH A CROSS ATHMANANDHA COLONY SULTAN PALYA R.T. NAGAR POST BENGALURU Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39414-DB RFA No. 1595 of 2022 KARNATAKA-32 ORIGINAL DEFENDANT No.1-3 ARE REP BY THEIR GPA HOLDER NAMELY SRI. M.A. CHARLES S/O M. ARUL AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 4. SRI. M.A. CHARLES S/O M. ARUL AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT. No.96, SBM COLONY ANAND NAGAR MAIN ROAD HEBBAL, BENGALURU KARNATAKA-560 024 …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. JAYASHREE T.V., ADVOCATE -(ABSENT)) AND: MR. CHETHAN KUMAR T. S/O K. THIPPAIAH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/AT No.16 BEERESHWARA NILAYA 13TH CROSS, 9TH CROSS RBI COLONY, GANGANAGAR BENGALURU-24 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY P.M., ADVOCATE FOR C/R - (ABSENT)) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39414-DB RFA No. 1595 of 2022 THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.06.2022 PASSED IN OS No.5922/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE XLII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) There is no appearance for the appellants. 2. Till today, office objections are not complied. Therefore, in view of the peremptory order dated 05.09.2024 passed by this Court, no further order is required. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39414-DB RFA No. 1595 of 2022 3. Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE PN List No.: 4 Sl No.: 7