IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 229 RA-CR-206-CII-2010 IN FAO-3432-2009 Date of Decision:20.05.2025 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD ....Review-applicant V/S SANTOSH AND ORS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Deepak Goyat, Advocate for the review-applicant. Mr. Gopal Mittal, Advocate and Mr. S.S. Tiwana, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4. None for respondent No.6. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Counsel for the review-applicant is not in a position to argue the matter as he states that he does not have the copy of the paper book or the review-application. He further states that he had contacted the applicant but they are not able to trace the record. 2. It seems that the review-applicant is not interested in pursuing the application. 3. Dismissed in default for non-prosecution. 4. Liberty is granted to the review-applicant to seek revival of the application, in case, they intend to pursue it. ( SUVIR SEHGAL ) 20.05.2025 JUDGE pooja saini Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No