VIKRAM SINGH KUSHWAHA v. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
WPC/1055/2022 · 2025-07-02
Shri Arvind Kumar Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7925 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7925 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 722 of 2022 Vikram Singh Kushwaha S/o Shri Satyendra Singh Kushwaha Aged About 42 Years Bus Operator Shanti Nagar Ward, Kushwaha Marg Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Regional Transport Authority Chhattisgarh Region Atal Nagar, Sector-27, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Regional Transport Authority, Bastar Region, Jagalpur District Bastar Chhattisgarh., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s) WPC No. 1055 of 2022 Vikram Singh Kushwaha S/o Shri Satyendra Singh Kushwaha Aged About 42 Years Bus Operator Shanti Nagar Ward, Kushwaha Marg Jagdalpur District Bastar (C.G.)
---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Regional Transport Authority Chhattisgarh Region, Atal Nagar, Sector- 27, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Regional Transport Authority Bastar Region, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.)
--- Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Nupur Trivedi, PL.
Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 03.07.2025
2
1. When the matters are called out for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Even in the second call, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.
2. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petitions for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the above petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution. CC as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma)
Judge J/-