- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51227 RP No. 122 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD REVIEW PETITION NO.122 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ERAMMA W/O C.T.JAYAPAL, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, 2. DUSHYANTH C.J. S/O LATE C.T. JAYAPAL, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PETITIONR NOS.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, BELAGODU HOBLI, SAKALESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 134 3. SMT. RADHA D/O C.T. JAYAPAL, W/O SURESH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT BALLUR VILLAGE, PALYA HOBLI, SINGODANAHALLI POST, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 218 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. YASHWANTH NETHAJI N.T., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K V NARASIMHAN., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE N R CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51227 RP No. 122 of 2025 2. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N R CIRCLE BANGALORE - 56 3. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (SOUTH), BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BANASHANKARI ZONE BANGALORE - 560 070. 4. THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BANASHANKARI ZONE BENGALURU - 560 070. 5. SMT. NIVEDITHA W/O MAHESH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.2518, 1ST FLOOR, 27TH CROSS, 17TH MAIN ROAD, BANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 070. …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, 1908, PRAYING TO a) ALLOW THIS REVIEW PETITION AND REVIEW THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED IN W.P.NO.23581/2022 (LB-BMP) DATED 04.12.2024; b) GRANT SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51227 RP No. 122 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER This Court has disposed of the writ petition in W.P. No.23581/2022 by the order dated 04.12.2024 directing the fourth respondent to issue Katha for the subject property in favour of the petitioner therein subject to the orders in the pending suit in O.S. No.1487/2022. This Court, inter alia, has observed that bequeath is not interdicted only because some persons have filed objections to the revenue entries and if there is a dispute about the bequeath, it can only be decided by the competent civil Court. The present review petition is filed asserting a bequeath excluding the petitioners contending that they are the legal heirs of the Testator and that they should have been made parties to the present proceedings. It would suffice for this Court to observe that even if it could be that the petitioners can establish that they should have been arrayed as - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51227 RP No. 122 of 2025 parties in the proceedings, they will have their remedies otherwise than by a review and the jurisdiction for review is based on an error apparent. This Court is not persuaded to opine that there is an error apparent only because the petitioners assert that they should have been arrayed as parties. As such, reserving liberty subject to all just exceptions to the petitioners to avail remedy, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE AN/-