YESHPAL SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH IT PRINCIPAL SECRETARY EDUCATION
CWP/19889/2025 · 2025-07-31
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79244 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 79244 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-19889-2025
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
115
CWP-19889-2025
Date of Decision: 31.07.2025
Yeshpal Singh
…Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present:- Mr. Rohit Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent-Department to give benefits of stepping-up of pay to the petitioner at par with his junior employee-respondent no.3.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed to decide his pending representation, dated 15.04.2025, Annexure P-7, in a specified period.
3.
Notice of motion.
4.
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice and submits that the pending representation, dated 15.04.2025, will be decided by respondent no.2/Director, Elementary Education, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of three months.
5.
In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. PAYAL 2025.07.31 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-19889-2025
-2-
6.
Ordered accordingly.
7.
In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE 31.07.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PAYAL 2025.07.31 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document