- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39877 WP No. 25714 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.25714 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: BASAVANYAPPA SON OF LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RESIDENT OF MUDUVALA VILLAGE SHIVAMOGGA TALUK :DISTRICT - 577204 SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HIREMATHAD MAHESHIAH RUDRAYYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYATH RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001 2. ZILLA PANCHAYATH SHIVAMOGGA THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYATH SHIVAMOGGA - 577202 3. TALUK PANCHAYATH SHIVAMOGGA REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYATH SHIVAMOGGA SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577202 4. KONAGAVALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39877 WP No. 25714 of 2024 PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER KONAGAVALLI SHIVAMOGGA - TALUK: DISTRICT - 577216 5. SHRI.CHANDRAPPA SON OF KARIBASAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 6. SHRI.SHANKAR SON OF KARIBASAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 7. SHRI.KARIBASAPPA SON OF SANNAHANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 8. SMT.SARITHA WIFE OF NAGARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 9. SMT. ROOPA WIFE OF MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT40 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.5 TO 9 ARE THE RESIDENTS OF KONAGAVALLI VILLAGE SHIVAMOGGA - TALUK: DISTRICT - 577416 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.H.K.KENCHEGOWDA, AGA FOR R.1; R.2, R.3, R.4, R.5, R.6, R.8 AND R.9 ARE SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING OF THE UNDATED ORDER, PASSED IN APPEAL IN R.A.NO.01/21-22 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39877 WP No. 25714 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Despite grant of time on 22.04.2025 to take steps against respondent No.7, steps are not taken. In that view of the matter, the petition as against respondent No.7 stands abated. Consequently, the petition stands abated in its entirety. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12