Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.A.No.598 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE : 25.09.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.A.No.598 of 2017 Seenu @ Srinivasan ... Appellant/Accused Versus State rep. by The Inspector of Police, W-24, All Woman Police Station, Teynampet, Chennai. (Crime No.2 of 2014). ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the judgment and sentence passed by the learned Special Court for cases under POCSO Act, 2012, Mahila Court at Chennai in S.C.No.228 of 2014 dated 21.07.2017 convicting the appellant for an offence under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, the appellant is sentenced to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default, to undergo further period of 6 months rigorous imprisonment. For Appellant : Mr.M.Rajavelu For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.598 of 2017
JUDGMENT The Criminal Appeal has been filed by the appellant/accused seeking to set aside the judgment of conviction passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Cases under POCSO Act, 2012/Mahila Court, Chennai in Sessions Case No.228 of 2014 dated 21.07.2017.
2. On the previous occasion, i.e., on 09.09.2025, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the appellant had undergone the sentence and sought time to get the certificate from the prison authorities.
3. Today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor produced a report submitted by the Superintendent, Central Prison, Chennai, which is extracted hereunder: 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.598 of 2017 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.598 of 2017
4. From the report, it is seen that the appellant had already undergone his period of conviction with some remission. The appellant was released on
12.02.2025. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication in the above appeal. 5.Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal stands dismissed. 25.09.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking / Non-speaking order rsi 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.598 of 2017 To 1.The Sessions Judge, Special Court for Cases under POCSO Act, 2012/Mahila Court, Chennai. 2.The Inspector of Police, W-24, All Woman Police Station, Teynampet, Chennai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.598 of 2017 M.NIRMAL KUMAR
, J.
rsi Crl.A.No.598 of 2017 25.09.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis