Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79227 (PNJ)

AMARJIT SINGH v. MANJIT KAUR

FAO/7549/2016 · 2025-03-05

Sudhir Singh, Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (210) Amarjit Singh Manjit Kaur CORAM : Present: SUDHIR SINGH the present appeal, the respondent has expired and in the said circum the present appeal as such. 2. 3. March 5th, 2025 sailesh Whether speaking/reasoned : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amarjit Singh Versus Manjit Kaur CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Ms.Kudrat Sareen, Advocate, for Mr.Sarju Puri, Advocate for the Ms.Saroj Kumari, Advocate for Mr.S.K.Sharma, Advocate, for the respond ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (Oral) Counsel for the respondent submits that during the pendency of the present appeal, the respondent has expired and in the said circum the present appeal becomes infructuous and prays that the same be disposed of Dismissed as rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, be disposed of, accordingly. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether Reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-7549-2016 (O&M) Decided on : 05.03.2025 ……Appellant(s) Versus ……Respondent(s) SUDHIR SINGH SUKHVINDER KAUR Ms.Kudrat Sareen, Advocate, for , Advocate for the appellant. for Mr.S.K.Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. Counsel for the respondent submits that during the pendency of the present appeal, the respondent has expired and in the said circumstances, and prays that the same be disposed of Dismissed as rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, be disposed of, accordingly. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No (s) ……Respondent(s) Counsel for the respondent submits that during the pendency of stances, and prays that the same be disposed of SAILESH RANJAN 2025.03.07 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document