Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79221 (ALL)

DHANNU KUMAR CHAUHAN AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/10714/2025 · 2025-08-05

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:132950 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10714 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dhannu Kumar Chauhan And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:- "A.Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 4 to release the payment of salary in favour of petitioner month by month as a post of peon in the aforesaid institution. B.Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to consider the claim of petitioners." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no. 4 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Sri Santosh Kumar, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard Sri Anand Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned standing counsel. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no 4 - District Inspector of Schools, District Ballia within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no. 4 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 6.8.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad