- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44175 RFA No. 199 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.199 OF 2008 (INJ) BETWEEN: SRI K SRINIVASAMURTHY S/O LATE KONDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.372, MASJID ROAD, YELAHANKA TOWN, BANGALORE-560 064. …APPELLANT (BY SRI S.G.PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT(NOC NOT OBTAINED) -ABSENT SRI B V THILAK, ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT -ABSENT) AND: SRI G ESHWARAPPA S/O G.NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.222/8, KAMAKSHAMMA LAYOUT, PUTTENAHALLI CROSS, YELAHANKA TOWN, BANGALORE-560 064. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.03.2007 PASSED IN O.S.No.1246/1996 ON THE FILE OF THE XI ADDL.CITY CIVIL JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT, BANGALORE, (CCH-8), DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION. Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44175 RFA No. 199 of 2008 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ARGUMENTS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT None appears for the appellant. Even on the last date of hearing there was no representation. 2. Taking note of the fact that Regular First Appeal is of the year 2008 and to afford a reasonable opportunity, this Court listed the matter to today for hearing as a last chance in the interest of justice. 3. However today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. In fact, Sri S.G. Parthasarathy who had undertaken to file vakalath for the appellant and proceeded with the appeal, has not even chosen to file the vakalath on behalf of the appellant. 4. Taking note of these aspects of the matter, appeal stand dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR