COCP-2934 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 103 Ram Chandra Saini Smt. Anupa Saini CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. the Contempt of Courts Act has been filed by the petitioner/grand of the minor child/son of the respondent proceedings dated 12.07.2019 (Annexure P Magistrate Ist Class, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri in case bearing COMA No. 140 of 2015 titled as ‘ 2. 2934-2024 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Ram Chandra Saini Versus Smt. Anupa Saini CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. DK Prajapati, Legal Aid Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present Contempt Petition under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act has been filed by the petitioner/grand of the minor child/son of the respondent proceedings against the respondent for willfully disobeying the order 12.07.2019 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri in case bearing COMA 140 of 2015 titled as ‘Anoopa Saini vs. Vide order dated 12.07.2019, it was directed as under “2. Rather, this Court is of the opinion that meeting of grandfather with minor Aarav in his School at lunch time for half an hour, оn alternative Monday and Saturday of a week, will not only satisfy the spi 07.05.2019 but also will not have any adver minor Aarav. Therefore, frame work of visitation and frequencies is hereby decided in afore Copy of this order be provided to petitioner as well as respondent no.2, if such reques this order be sent to Principal of the School currently minor Aarav in studying. Regarding the address of school, respondent no.2 is directed to supply the address to concerned Ahlmad Sh.Pritam Singh. Now, the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2934-2024 Date of Decision: 11.08.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. DK Prajapati, Legal Aid Counsel Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate for the respondent. The present Contempt Petition under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act has been filed by the petitioner/grand-father of the minor child/son of the respondent herein, for initiating contempt against the respondent for willfully disobeying the order 5) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri in case bearing COMA vs. Arvind Saini and others’. 12.07.2019, it was directed as under:- Rather, this Court is of the opinion that meeting of with minor Aarav in his School at lunch time for alternative Monday and Saturday of a week, will not only satisfy the spirit of order passed on dated 07.05.2019 but also will not have any adverse impact upon minor Aarav. Therefore, frame work of visitation and its frequencies is hereby decided in afore-referred manner. be provided to petitioner as well as respondent no.2, if such request is made. Further, copy of this order be sent to Principal of the School in which currently minor Aarav in studying. Regarding the address of espondent no.2 is directed to supply the address to Ahlmad Sh.Pritam Singh. Now, the case is The present Contempt Petition under Sections 10 and 12 of father herein, for initiating contempt against the respondent for willfully disobeying the order 5) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri in case bearing COMA Rather, this Court is of the opinion that meeting of with minor Aarav in his School at lunch time for alternative Monday and Saturday of a week, of order passed on dated impact upon its referred manner. be provided to petitioner as well as made. Further, copy of which currently minor Aarav in studying. Regarding the address of espondent no.2 is directed to supply the address to case is RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.13 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2934 3. respondent is taken on record. A copy thereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. undertakes next date of hearing before the learned trial Court which is stated to be 28.08.2025 away from the school on the alternative recorded by the Principal, DAV Cent (Yamuna Nagar) in Annexure 5. passed in the present petition 6. comply with the order dated would be at liberty 7. 8. 11.08.2025 rishu 2934-2024 -2- adjourned to 14.08.2019 checking the execution of the directions as well as for further proceedings.” Reply dated 28.04.2025, filed in Court on beh respondent is taken on record. A copy thereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent that aforesaid direction shall be complied with in next date of hearing before the learned trial Court which is stated to be 28.08.2025. He further undertakes that the minor child shall not be taken away from the school on the alternative recorded by the Principal, DAV Centenary Public School, Radaur (Yamuna Nagar) in Annexures P-11 and 12. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same stands It is, however, made clear that in case, respondent fails to comply with the order dated 12.07.2019 (Annexure P would be at liberty to again approach this Court. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable checking the execution of the as well as for further proceedings.” 28.04.2025, filed in Court on behalf of the respondent is taken on record. A copy thereof, has been supplied to At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent that aforesaid direction shall be complied with in toto from the next date of hearing before the learned trial Court which is stated to be the minor child shall not be taken away from the school on the alternative Monday and Saturday, as enary Public School, Radaur 11 and 12. no further orders are required to be stands disposed of, accordingly. It is, however, made clear that in case, respondent fails to 12.07.2019 (Annexure P-5), the petitioner to again approach this Court. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No checking the execution of the alf of the respondent is taken on record. A copy thereof, has been supplied to At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent from the next date of hearing before the learned trial Court which is stated to be the minor child shall not be taken Monday and Saturday, as enary Public School, Radaur no further orders are required to be It is, however, made clear that in case, respondent fails to he petitioner RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.13 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.