Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79191 (KAR)

SMT GEETHA N v. SRI HANUMANTHAUMLA NAIK

MFA/8016/2024 · 2025-07-12

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A PATIL & SRI. M.N. UMASHANKAR, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 8016/2024(MV) (Lok Adalat No. 6234/2025) BETWEEN 1. SMT. GEETHA N W/O LATE LAKKANNA S @ LAKKAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 2. AMRUTHALAKSHMI L D/O LATE LAKKANNA S @ LAKKAPPA, AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS, APPELLANT NO. 2 IS MINOR, REP. BY HER NATURAL GUARDILAN MOTHER. i.e., APPELLANT NO.1 SMT. GEETHA N W/O LATE LAKKANNA S @ LAKKAPPA 3. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS 2 ALL ARE R/O JANATHA COMPLEX, V.B.P. ROAD, HIRIYURU TOWN-577598, NOW R/O RAMESH DURGADA, SIRI HOTEL CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577501. … APPELLANTS (BY SRI. B. PRAMOD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. HANUMANTHAUMLA NAIK, S/O HANUMANTHA NAIK, MAJOR, OWNER OF CAR BEARING REGN NO. KA-05-MV-6156, UTHARAHALLI MAIN ROAD, BEHIND PAYALAMMA TEMPLE B.H.C.S. LAYOUT, BENGALURU DISTRICT-560061. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER HDFC GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, OPP. KIMS MAIN GATE, P.B. ROAD, VIDYANAGARA, HUBLI-580021. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H S LINGARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 31.01.2024 PASSED IN MVC NO. 61/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL MACT III CHITRADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. 3 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent - Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.3,77,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh Seventy Seven Thousand only) in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the Judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER srk