115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3452-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.09.2025 MEENA KUMARI JAIN ..Petitioner Versus ANINDITA MITRA, IAS AND OTHERS ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Raman B. Garg, Advocate Mr. Mayank Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Animesh Sharma, Addl. A.G, Punjab. SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J. (Oral) 1. The contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 07.01.2025 passed in CWP-35237- 2024, which is reproduced as under:- “1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioner to file a detailed representation, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn. However, in case a representation is filed within 4 weeks, the same be decided expeditiously, in accordance with law.” 2. Learned State counsel contends that in compliance of order dated 07.01.2025, a speaking order dated 19.09.2025 has been passed. Copy of the same has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner and also placed on record. MOHD AYUB 2025.09.24 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-3452-2025 (O&M) -2- 3. A perusal of speaking order dated 19.09.2025, shows that order dated 07.01.2025 passed in CWP-35237-2024, has been complied with. This fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the above, the contempt is purged and rule is discharged. 5. Needless to say that liberty is however granted to the petitioner to challenge the speaking order dated 19.09.2025 in accordance with law. September 23rd, 2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Ayub JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2025.09.24 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.