Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 79155 (KAR)

SRI HARISH KUMAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/8963/2022 · 2025-07-30

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29390 CRL.P No. 8963 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8963 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI HARISH KUMAR S/O SHANTHI LAL D JAIN AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.19, 24TH CROSS, CUBBON PET, BANGALORE-560001 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SHILPA RANI C, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA SAMPANGI RAMANAGAR POLICE BANGALORE-560002 REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE - 560001 2. SRI GURUPRASAD V M AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, POLICE INSPECTOR OF CCB F AND MN.T PETITIONER, BANGALORE-560002 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.LAKSHMAN, HCGP FOR R1) Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29390 CRL.P No. 8963 of 2022 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO I. QUASH THE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.575/2020 PENDING ON THE FILE OF IX ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU. ii. QUASH THE COMPLAINT DATED 24.08.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND CONSEQUENTLY THE FIR REGISTERED IN CR.NO.87/2020 BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ALSO THE CHARGE SHEET FILED IN C.C.NO.575/2020 PENDING ON THE FILE OF IX ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-C FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 51(1)(B) AND 63 OF COPY RIGHT ACT 1957. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner. 2. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session. 3. This matter is of the year 2022. 4. Vide order dated 18.07.2025, as a last chance, a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29390 CRL.P No. 8963 of 2022 5. Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. 6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8