3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT RAJESH MITTU RAVINA MITTU CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present Mr. None for the respondent. * ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA 1. This Appeal is filed by the decree of the Family Court, Hoshiarpur refusing to grant divorce to the appellant. 2. We are informed that during the pendency of th respondent-wife has died. The death certificate is also produced before this Court and the same is taken on record. The Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place. 3. In such view of the matter, nothing survives in the present case. Therefore, learned counsel for the appellant come dismissal of th 4. In view of the aforesaid, this Appeal is pressed. 5. All pending applications accordingly. July 23, 2025 Ess Kay Whether speaking / reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: RAJESH MITTU V RAVINA MITTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate for the None for the respondent. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral) This Appeal is filed by the husband against the judgment and decree of the Family Court, Hoshiarpur refusing to grant divorce to the We are informed that during the pendency of th wife has died. The death certificate is also produced before this urt and the same is taken on record. The Registry is directed to tag the appropriate place. In such view of the matter, nothing survives in the present case. Therefore, learned counsel for the appellant come dismissal of this Appeal as not pressed. In view of the aforesaid, this Appeal is All pending applications, if any, [ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA [KULDEEP TIWARI 2025 Whether speaking / reasoned : Whether Reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-M-133-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision:23rd July, 2025 .…...Appellant(s) V/s. ......Respondent(s) ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA KULDEEP TIWARI Advocate for the appellant. husband against the judgment and decree of the Family Court, Hoshiarpur refusing to grant divorce to the We are informed that during the pendency of this Appeal, the wife has died. The death certificate is also produced before this urt and the same is taken on record. The Registry is directed to tag the In such view of the matter, nothing survives in the present case. Therefore, learned counsel for the appellant comes up with a prayer for In view of the aforesaid, this Appeal is dismissed as not , if any, in this case are disposed of ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] JUDGE [KULDEEP TIWARI] JUDGE : Yes / No : Yes / No SURESH KUMAR 2025.07.30 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document